20 thoughts on “‘Tocktacular!

  1. Birdcage October 13, 2016 / 9:05 am

    Yup – I’m prepared to call that a landslide win for those sASSy ‘tocks.

    • Murray C. October 13, 2016 / 11:02 am

      ? That is some fluffy butt, alright. We call them “furbelows” in our family – an arcane reference to women’s petticoats as I recall.

      Also, in keeping with the spirit of rules of cute, proportion of head to butt might be up for consideration (I know, it’s a trick of perspective, but, hey, we can make our own rules, right?)

  2. Smartypants October 13, 2016 / 9:16 am

    Checked out the Instagram – his front end is even cuter, if possible! Those smiling puppy pix!

    • allein ? October 13, 2016 / 9:55 am

      My work won’t let me see his Instagram!!!!! :'(

  3. DebG October 13, 2016 / 9:55 am

    Tucker has my vote.

  4. Gigi the cat lady October 13, 2016 / 10:15 am

    No Instagram at work for me either !!!! 🙁 But that butt is the flooffiest I’ve ever seen! 😀

  5. Dana October 13, 2016 / 10:43 am

    Whoa! Those are some seriously fluffy buns.

  6. ffleur October 13, 2016 / 10:55 am

    Oh man, you used the wide-angle lens again! (sez Tucker).

  7. Duckie ? October 13, 2016 / 11:15 am

    Spec-tock-ular!

  8. Carol October 13, 2016 / 11:22 am

    Now that’s a floofy booty.

  9. AJ October 13, 2016 / 11:31 am

    I like fluffy butts and I cannot lie.

    • JenDeyan October 13, 2016 / 11:43 am

      That gave me a giggle!

      I have to be a sheep and follow the herd on this one. Tucker is definitely fluffy ‘tocks blue ribbon winner.

  10. Laura October 13, 2016 / 11:40 am

    That is a seriously impressive photo of some outstandingly floofy tocks, all right! Tucker is adorable, front or back view,that’s for sure!

  11. Shan October 13, 2016 / 1:50 pm

    Sir Mix-A-Lot’s song is going through my head!

    • allein ? October 13, 2016 / 8:10 pm

      awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

      • Faye October 13, 2016 / 9:56 pm

        Doggie’s got PULKIES!

        Jewish explanation: “I’ve noticed during the past year the frequency which Jews (in particular) love to call my daughter ‘delicious,’ and I must confess that I am guilty of using this phrase to describe adorable children as well. Jews also use the Yiddish word “pulkies” to describe my daughter’s chunky (adorable) thighs, which is always said with tremendous affection. I only wish someone would describe my chunky thighs as adorable and edible. I am still waiting. But I digress.

        But how did it come about to equate cuteness with edible-ness? In the case of the Jewish use of “pulkies,” which also means chicken legs, there is clearly a direct link between food and adorableness. Jews love food (doesn’t everyone!?), Jews love babies. I guess it makes sense. Thesaurus.com even has an entry for delicious, stating the synonyms for delicious as “cute; loveable.” Well babies are definitely those things, or at least, most of the time.

        I am hardly the first person who has posed this oh-so-important question relating to babies and the etymology of adorable edibleness. In fact, this dad writes not that it is a Jewish phenomena, but that is a way women one-up one another in describing just how cute a child is. There’s also an actual scientific phenomena called “cute aggression,” but I am not gonna touch that concept.

        By saying that a child is so cute that we want to eat them, or taste them, we are really paying tasty food the highest compliment: there is nothing better than eating something yummy. I guess a close second is cute baby.”

    • Claire October 13, 2016 / 11:09 pm

      Yay! I was about to share this too. Love that little glance back at the beginning.

      • Murray C. October 14, 2016 / 12:11 am

        Yes, wasn’t that adorable? And later he gives another half glance – “Help me out a little here, won’tcha? Zcheesh!”

  12. sugitomo October 13, 2016 / 11:25 pm

    Wow, those are some serious ‘tocks!

Comments are closed.